Outsider


I grew up in Northern Ireland and have been a teacher and lived in England, Ghana, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Malawi, Mexico, Colombia, The United Arab Emirates, Australia, Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia.

These are my memoirs which are arranged chronologically by year. Much is social commentary.

Aside from narrative recount, the style is often anecdotal, aphoristic and ironical. I try to soften the heavy social commentary with humour. Some friends have said I tend to 'rant' at times. I don't deny it! Perhaps it is the Irish in me. I apologise in advance then, if that is your impression too.

I do not intend to stereotype various nationalities but inevitably I will generalise for dramatic effect.

In a globalised multicultural world there is an urgent need to identify and face up to our national idiosyncracies and shortcomings. Nationalism has always seemed to me to be a bogus substitute for a genuine sense of connectedness and community. It is a highly dangerous concept when manipulated by politicians to get citizens to do things that are unpalatable to them-like going to war for instance.

If we don't begin to see ourselves as others perceive us - and not as we would like to see ourselves, then catastrophe looms.

I contend we can be comfortable with our heritage and still be able to criticize and even laugh at ourselves at the same time.


The two are not mutually exclusive.

Outsiders are in a unique position to show us our shortcomings because we simply cannot see them ourselves.

I believe that no culture has found the ideal 'solutions' to the challenges of life. Every culture I have lived in has both positive and disturbing characteristics.

In which cultures do people appear happiest? (notwithstanding natural and man-made disasters such as war and famine)

What question can be more profound than that?

The results may be surprising. In my experience, the happiest cultures were Ghana, Malawi, Mexico and Colombia. At the bottom of the list would be England, Ireland and Australia.

I think we need to learn from each other-not try to 'teach' each other...there is a big difference.

Please send me an E-mail if you would like to comment on anything.


Outsider


Outsider1952@gmail.com









Search This Blog

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu
This is where I would like to be after I have robbed the bank

Winners and Losers

Winners and Losers
Debate 2008 Winners and Losers Editor at left.

Friday, September 17, 2010

Job Applications and Interviews

Job Applications and Interviews - Change in the Rules for the New Millennium.

The job application and interview process has been reviewed.

The following is a list of infringements and the consequences they will attract for

Interviewers (Not applicants)

Before the Interview

For the following infringements:

Not acknowledging application received.

Asking for the age of the applicant on the application form

Not providing refreshment before the interview.

Not thanking the interviewee personally for taking the time to attend the interview.
Not being shown around the workplace before the interview

Using generic “Dear Candidate” type terms in the application correspondence.
(And not using the personal name of the candidate)

Asking the applicant to waste his time transcribing information to an application form instead of requesting a Curriculum Vitae.

These infringements will attract the penalty of ninety-nine lashes of the whip by the first ninety-nine applicants drawn at random from the applications list who did not receive an acknowledgement of their application from the Employer.

But for the following infringements before the interview there are more serious consequences:

Not offering to pay travel expenses to the applicant.

Not being given the E-mail contact addresses of other members of staff so that Interviewees can get a clear picture of what it is like to work in the organization.

Not sending to the applicant the profile of the interviewer with the following details of the INTERVIEWER: age, gender, format of interview, qualifications and experience to all interviewees by E-mail before an interview (This information must be received by the applicant within a reasonable period of time so that the applicant can decide if the interviewer is qualified to interview him).

Not sending to the applicant the exact questions which will be asked at interview..(These should constitute at least 75 percent of the total number of questions asked -the other 25% of questions can be unknown to the applicant at interview).




The Consequences will be:


Burial up to the chest in a hole in the ground followed by stoning to death by overqualified and/or candidates too poor to pay the expenses





During the interview:

Here are the new regulations governing the interview process itself:
The following infringements:

Not providing water or something to drink in the interview

The use of an officious self-important tone by the interviewer.

Inappropriate and/or provocative dress by the interviewer (such as low cut dress)


Will attract the consequence of:

99 lashes of the whip -one by each rejected applicant who didn’t make it to interview.
also for

Clearly not having read the curriculum Vitae of the interviewee

Having more than one interviewer at an interview. (Others can watch tapes afterwards)

Not video-taping the interview

Not allowing experienced job interviewees to talk at length about their job experiences


Not allowing the applicant to ask two personal questions to the interviewer. (So that the interviewee can make an assessment of the interviewer as a person)

these are all infringements deemed to be serious enough to attract the maximum penalty:

Burial up to the chest in a hole in the ground followed by stoning to death.






After the Interview


After the interview, the interviewer will be given a deadline by which time he must have informed the applicant of the result of the interview.
Failure to comply will result in an electric drill being applied to the employer’s knee-cap.

Interviewees who are unsuccessful at interview will be given free access to legal services at the expense of the employer. The appeals tribunal will consist of 99 persons who have been unemployed for six months or more, and one interviewer.

No comments:

Post a Comment