Outsider


I grew up in Northern Ireland and have been a teacher and lived in England, Ghana, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Malawi, Mexico, Colombia, The United Arab Emirates, Australia, Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia.

These are my memoirs which are arranged chronologically by year. Much is social commentary.

Aside from narrative recount, the style is often anecdotal, aphoristic and ironical. I try to soften the heavy social commentary with humour. Some friends have said I tend to 'rant' at times. I don't deny it! Perhaps it is the Irish in me. I apologise in advance then, if that is your impression too.

I do not intend to stereotype various nationalities but inevitably I will generalise for dramatic effect.

In a globalised multicultural world there is an urgent need to identify and face up to our national idiosyncracies and shortcomings. Nationalism has always seemed to me to be a bogus substitute for a genuine sense of connectedness and community. It is a highly dangerous concept when manipulated by politicians to get citizens to do things that are unpalatable to them-like going to war for instance.

If we don't begin to see ourselves as others perceive us - and not as we would like to see ourselves, then catastrophe looms.

I contend we can be comfortable with our heritage and still be able to criticize and even laugh at ourselves at the same time.


The two are not mutually exclusive.

Outsiders are in a unique position to show us our shortcomings because we simply cannot see them ourselves.

I believe that no culture has found the ideal 'solutions' to the challenges of life. Every culture I have lived in has both positive and disturbing characteristics.

In which cultures do people appear happiest? (notwithstanding natural and man-made disasters such as war and famine)

What question can be more profound than that?

The results may be surprising. In my experience, the happiest cultures were Ghana, Malawi, Mexico and Colombia. At the bottom of the list would be England, Ireland and Australia.

I think we need to learn from each other-not try to 'teach' each other...there is a big difference.

Please send me an E-mail if you would like to comment on anything.


Outsider


Outsider1952@gmail.com









Search This Blog

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu
This is where I would like to be after I have robbed the bank

Winners and Losers

Winners and Losers
Debate 2008 Winners and Losers Editor at left.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

2016 Student false beliefs K Generic Reading


Every word must be understood in order to comprehend a text



Reading for pleasure is a waste of time



I can learn to speak and listen by reading



There are several myths related to reading. The first is that there is only one type of reading-and that is intensive reading in which every word must be understood in order for the message to be comprehended. Teachers know this is not true but it is very difficult to persuade recent arrivals that they must skim and scan academic articles and that readers can comprehend gist without knowing the meaning of every single word.

SA second myth is that reading is always painful, hard work and can never be pleasurable. The idea of reading for pleasure is rare in second language speakers. This is because reading is associated with boredom and pain in my second language learning contexts overseas. Naturally, the last thing people want is more pain!

One of the few exceptions is my wife who reads biographies and novels for pleasure. She is a Spanish speaker who learned English as an adult. She can read quickly too and recently read an Australian fictional writer who topped the New York Best sellers list in two or three days. (Liane Moriarity). It took me two weeks.  My wife is a good reader but she does not have any exceptional reading skills. What is exceptional is that she understands that reading can be for pleasure

A third myth is that all the other skills have to be learned through reading! This includes speaking. Many learners have an overreliance on reading and writing as learning tools. This is a result of poor teacher-centred pedagogy and methodology in their home countries. Teacher-centred pedagogies and methodologies rely on reading and writing and writing because it is easier for the for the teacher to mark and the institution assess written products. The validity of such assessments is often not high–but the convenience outweighs the lack of validity.

Such is the dominance of reading and writing that even esoteric topics like Pronunciation are believed to be learnable my ‘studying’ them mainly through reading and writing! Of course all the macro skills are involved in learning pronunciation-but only intensive and extensive listening and speaking practice will produce lasting results






No comments:

Post a Comment