Teaching Academic English: The Independent
Learner
This series of comments and posts is based mostly on my experience of teaching adult students at two Universities and one language college in Australia and in Schools and Universities overseas. I have also tutored adults on a one to one basis in Australia. The most numerous group of students might be Chinese-but there have also been significant numbers of South Americans-Brazilians in particular, Indians. Malaysians, Vietnamese, Japanese, Koreans, Saudis and some Europeans. I have also taught in schools in the Middle East, Asia, Europe and AfricaThese insights might form the basis of a series of workshops for teacher trainees or for the professional development of lecturers on teacher training programs
Most teachers (who
are not teaching just for the money) would agree that one major objective of good
teaching is to produce an autonomous learner-someone who is able to learn
independently of the teacher. The Universities and Business College in
Australia which deliver much Academic English unfortunately do not have
this as a main objective: at best they pay
only lip-service to it. At worst, they
covertly discourage independent learning. An independent learner by definition
is independent of the teacher and the University-and as such will not pay more
fees for tuition. There is a clear conflict of interest here between the interests
of the University and the student.
Getting out of the
passenger seat
I was teaching a friend how to drive recently. In fact she
already is a qualified driver-but only for an automatic car. She wants to learn
to drive a manual because they are cheaper
to buy. She is a refugee so this would be an important saving for her.
Basically, it has been difficult because she has completely
underestimated the task. Although she has the road sense skills from her
driving an automatic she does not know how tricky it is to manage the manual
transmission.
After three long lessons she was quite depressed and I thought
she was going to give up.
Today, at the beginning of the fourth lesson, I got out of
the car and asked her to drive on her own around the car park area and along
some deserted service roads in the deserted factory complex. At the end of the
lesson she was so grateful. She said she felt much more confident and thought
that some day she would learn to enjoy driving a manual car.
It is a similar situation with teaching English. At some
point the teacher has to get out of the car and let the learner drive on her
own.
Unfortunately the language ‘Industry’ has a direct vested
interest in NOT letting this happen-they want the student to continue learning
for ever –so they can keep collecting money from them. This is a conflict of
interest for many Universities and language colleges. It is an issue I will return
to again and again in this series of posts.
Only experienced teachers have direct knowledge about
autonomous learning..Younger teachers
may have been told about it or read about it, but will not have direct
experience of it. It is something which is appreciated only with
experience.
However, teaching programs in Universities and Colleges will often recruit younger teachers –as it is good for their bottom
line..they are cheaper. This is just one of the many problems which have come about
by allowing business and commercial interests to
hijack the teaching and learning profession. Even the language has changed-teaching
language is no longer ‘Education’ taught by ‘Lecturers’ –it is ‘training’ delivered
by ‘Instructors’. The focus of the language
learning process has changed from being an empowering learning experience
for learners into a commercial product to be sold to ‘customers’. Often, this
product is sold by marketers who don’t
know the difference between language learning and a bar of soap. The impact of business on Language goes well
beyond this of course- the commercial imperative has grossly distorted pedagogy and methodology
–but that is another story entirely –perhaps for another series of posts
When the students take their final exam or test they either
pass or fail. Most passes and now consider themselves good or even perfect
users (and learners) of English. They
may carry this mistaken belief about themselves with them for the rest of their
lives. While ot may be true it is not necessarily so. It is yet another
mistaken belief they will add to the myriads of others they have about learning.
We teachers know that only a few of these ‘successes’ are genuine autonomous
learners. Most have simply learned how to pass the test-an important skill-but
nothing to do with independent learning.
Those who fail are waiting for a better teacher to teach them
a better course. This is another mistaken belief because there is really not
that much difference between courses or teachers. It goes without saying that
none of the failures are autonomous learners either.
I estimate that of all the students I have taught only about
twenty percent were autonomous learners
after they exited the program-and many of these were autonomous before they even
entered it!
This is a sad and sorry state of affairs for the teacher who
wants to produce autonomous and
independent learners. It is also a disgraceful
state of affairs from the point of view of the Universities and Colleges who
claim to be educating students to be independent learners.
The question is why is it like this?
One of the reasons students don’t become independent learners
is certainly because of the commercial imperative as I have already explained.
Basically the managers (not the teachers ) of the program don’t care about
independent learning. Their KPIs are based on student input numbers. Bums on
seats.
However, another reason
is because of the mistaken
beliefs and preconceptions the students bring to the course. These
preconceptions and mistaken beliefs come from their own personal educational
history –and to some extent from their own personalities. They bring these to
the course and they wreak absolute havoc with their progress towards autonomous learning.
This series of posts will look at some the misconceptions
and mistaken beliefs adult students bring with them to Australia. However, the
general theme of commercialisation of language delivery will never be far away!
No comments:
Post a Comment