Outsider


I grew up in Northern Ireland and have been a teacher and lived in England, Ghana, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Malawi, Mexico, Colombia, The United Arab Emirates, Australia, Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia.

These are my memoirs which are arranged chronologically by year. Much is social commentary.

Aside from narrative recount, the style is often anecdotal, aphoristic and ironical. I try to soften the heavy social commentary with humour. Some friends have said I tend to 'rant' at times. I don't deny it! Perhaps it is the Irish in me. I apologise in advance then, if that is your impression too.

I do not intend to stereotype various nationalities but inevitably I will generalise for dramatic effect.

In a globalised multicultural world there is an urgent need to identify and face up to our national idiosyncracies and shortcomings. Nationalism has always seemed to me to be a bogus substitute for a genuine sense of connectedness and community. It is a highly dangerous concept when manipulated by politicians to get citizens to do things that are unpalatable to them-like going to war for instance.

If we don't begin to see ourselves as others perceive us - and not as we would like to see ourselves, then catastrophe looms.

I contend we can be comfortable with our heritage and still be able to criticize and even laugh at ourselves at the same time.


The two are not mutually exclusive.

Outsiders are in a unique position to show us our shortcomings because we simply cannot see them ourselves.

I believe that no culture has found the ideal 'solutions' to the challenges of life. Every culture I have lived in has both positive and disturbing characteristics.

In which cultures do people appear happiest? (notwithstanding natural and man-made disasters such as war and famine)

What question can be more profound than that?

The results may be surprising. In my experience, the happiest cultures were Ghana, Malawi, Mexico and Colombia. At the bottom of the list would be England, Ireland and Australia.

I think we need to learn from each other-not try to 'teach' each other...there is a big difference.

Please send me an E-mail if you would like to comment on anything.


Outsider


Outsider1952@gmail.com









Search This Blog

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu
This is where I would like to be after I have robbed the bank

Winners and Losers

Winners and Losers
Debate 2008 Winners and Losers Editor at left.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

Rules vocab and dictionaries


English can be learned like maths by the learning of rules and applying them

Vocabulary can be learned using a dictionary

The dictionary is to be trusted more than the teacher



This is one of my favourites: the false belief that learning a language is like learning Maths.

You just learn the rules and apply them. Nothing could be further from the truth.

While it may be true for Maths it certainly is not true for learning English as a second language

Many adults don’t realise that much language is acquired not learned. A lot of language is learned at your mother’s knee: first it is received and then later produced as the child matures. This is an automatic process of acquisition–not a planned step by step process of learning the rules and applying them. Most adults fail to understand this. The acquisition continues in a total immersion environment of the child as it matures into an adult.

The reason for the perpetuation of the myth is because we have been indoctrinated by commercial and political interests to believe it! It is in the interests of Language Colleges, schools and universities to perpetuate the myth that they are indispensable for language learning! Necessary–perhaps? But not entirely indispensable. Let’s say that they exaggerate their own importance for obvious reasons!

This false belief means that many adults are reluctant to concede the importance of ‘acquiring’ language outside class by speaking to native speakers, reading newspapers and watching movies etc.

Although the teacher may be given an exaggerated importance by many learners, when it comes to vocabulary the dictionary is given even more importance. Many students quite erroneously believe that looking up the meaning of the word in the dictionary is the way to learn vocabulary.

Research shows that in order to retain the meaning of a word in your long term memory you have to ‘learn’ it 3 times with at least 24 hours in between each learning episode or activity. Looking the word up in a dictionary might be the first one of those activities. But the learner has to be exposed to the meaning of the word at least twice more in order to put it onto his long–term memory. Just looking the word up in the dictionary does not achieve this. Many students believe it does.

Talking of dictionaries, if there is a discrepancy between what a teacher says is the meaning of a word and the dictionary meaning -then the learner will often believe the dictionary-such is the power of the written word. If it is written down-it must be right!


No comments:

Post a Comment