Outsider


I grew up in Northern Ireland and have been a teacher and lived in England, Ghana, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Malawi, Mexico, Colombia, The United Arab Emirates, Australia, Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia.

These are my memoirs which are arranged chronologically by year. Much is social commentary.

Aside from narrative recount, the style is often anecdotal, aphoristic and ironical. I try to soften the heavy social commentary with humour. Some friends have said I tend to 'rant' at times. I don't deny it! Perhaps it is the Irish in me. I apologise in advance then, if that is your impression too.

I do not intend to stereotype various nationalities but inevitably I will generalise for dramatic effect.

In a globalised multicultural world there is an urgent need to identify and face up to our national idiosyncracies and shortcomings. Nationalism has always seemed to me to be a bogus substitute for a genuine sense of connectedness and community. It is a highly dangerous concept when manipulated by politicians to get citizens to do things that are unpalatable to them-like going to war for instance.

If we don't begin to see ourselves as others perceive us - and not as we would like to see ourselves, then catastrophe looms.

I contend we can be comfortable with our heritage and still be able to criticize and even laugh at ourselves at the same time.


The two are not mutually exclusive.

Outsiders are in a unique position to show us our shortcomings because we simply cannot see them ourselves.

I believe that no culture has found the ideal 'solutions' to the challenges of life. Every culture I have lived in has both positive and disturbing characteristics.

In which cultures do people appear happiest? (notwithstanding natural and man-made disasters such as war and famine)

What question can be more profound than that?

The results may be surprising. In my experience, the happiest cultures were Ghana, Malawi, Mexico and Colombia. At the bottom of the list would be England, Ireland and Australia.

I think we need to learn from each other-not try to 'teach' each other...there is a big difference.

Please send me an E-mail if you would like to comment on anything.


Outsider


Outsider1952@gmail.com









Search This Blog

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu
This is where I would like to be after I have robbed the bank

Winners and Losers

Winners and Losers
Debate 2008 Winners and Losers Editor at left.

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

2015 Corporate dysfunction:bitter fruit

The bitter fruits of corporate dysfunction

A few years ago I was involved in a 3 year 'Train the trainer'  project for teachers in Malaysia. The project was a disaster from the start because insufficient preparation was carried out either by the Malaysian government or the partnering private company that did the recruiting. However, like many others, because I needed work at the time I accepted an invitation to lead the project.

This involved me hiring 15 Academics within a period of about six weeks. It was quite a  task considering that academics are supposed to give considerable notice to their current employers before they will leave a post. Obviously, those who were prepared to move  immediately were given priority-not necessarily a good thing from the point to of view of quality control perhaps.. but that is another story entirely. For more details visit this link.

http://lifeandtimesofanoutsider.blogspot.com.au/search/label/2015%20Adelaide%20diary%209e%20Corporate%20irresponsibility%20The%20Training%20Fellows%20Project

I recruited most of the trainers by phone.

The last trainer I recruited was an Englishman who turned out to be a 'longstayer' on the project. In fact he was one of only 3 of the 15 original Trainers I recruited to complete the 3 years.

We were sound colleagues and had a good professional relationship during the eighteen months I was in post.

Fast forward a few years  to earlier this year and I was looking for work with the same company as an E trainer-based in Adelaide. My ex-colleague, who is now leading this project lead me to understand after interview that I had been selected for a start date a couple of months hence.  We exchanged pleasantries in several E-mails.  Unfortunately, during this period one of the directors of the company unexpectedly passed away from a heart attack. I was not sure if this would affect the project or not.  I thought there might perhaps be a delayed start date.

There was a delay: three months passed. During this period  I e-mailed my former colleague who was now leading this E-training project.

He didn't reply to either E-mail. Eventually, I had to  e-mail another director to ask him if there had been a delay.

He told me the Government had cancelled the project.

Now my point is this..why didn't my former colleague reply to my E-mails? It is hardly because he didn't receive them. Presumably he did but had been instructed by his corporate bosses not to reply. (either that or he was just being deliberately negligent or bloody-minded. I have no reason to believe the latter was the case as I had known him previously to be both competent and generous)

There would have been dozens of other trainers in my position waiting to get start-up instructions for the project. This means dozens of professionals like myself disappointed and unable to schedule our own time. Huge inconvenience caused by corporate callousness.

This type of corporate abuse is unacceptable and should be punished.

How can corporate entities expect employee to be loyal to them when thy are so blatantly disloyal and /or incompetent to their employees?

Loyalty is a two-way process.

As for my ex-colleague who didn't answer my e-mails-well...

I'm sure he can live with it.




No comments:

Post a Comment