Corporate irresponsibility in Malaysia: The Training Fellows
Project
I’ve been meaning to write about this for some years.
Towards the end of 2011 I realized that the Training Fellows
Project English language project involving by a
private British company in Malaysia using funds from the Deputy Priminster was basically a rort.
Several Training Fellows had left the project to seek other
work.
I was very dissatisfied myself and had come to the
conclusion (after about twelve months) that the 36 month project was irredeemable. I felt my position
was increasingly untenable
The preposterous situation was that my corporate employer
was only happy for me to continue to
receive my good salary and enjoy my benefits as long as I remained in post and did
absolutely nothing!
Catch 22!
After twelve months the situation had become unsustainable. All fifteen of the training fellows in the
five University teacher training colleges were expected to produce a monthly
plan of our proposed activities upon which the HOD at each university would
sign off. This sounds quite reasonable–but the Catch 22 was that neither the
HOD, nor the Lecturers wanted us to do any work! So the monthly plan was a work
of total fiction–created with the collusion of the Malaysian HOD and her
Lecturers in order to satisfy the Ministry of Education–our paymasters. Upon
receipt of our reports the Mod then paid our company who then paid us.
So..no plan? ..no salary.
When we complained to our company that the plans were fictitious
we were studiously ignored. The British company was happy to pay us for doing absolutely
nothing. After a few months of this some training Fellows started to seek
positions elsewhere.
The Malaysian HOD and the lecturers were justifiably upset
that they had not been consulted during the set-up phase of this project. This
was the responsibility of the MOE and the company. In fact , when many of us physically arrived at the University ‘in trios’
in January to start the project on the first day of the year, the HOD did not
even know who we were! They were not expecting us and justifiably were
astonished and upset when we told them! Imagine the reaction of an HOD at a school in Australia if three new
‘experienced foreigners’ turned up on day one expecting to have have their classes timetabled!
The fact that many of the Training Fellows were not ‘experienced’
Teacher trainers made a bad situation worse. Many of us had been recruited at
the last minute (by myself!) without knowing what the program was even about.
In fact, as the ‘leader’ of the program in the first 3 months myself I did not
know what the program was about myself -and this was because the company didn’t
know either!
Not knowing the program was one of the reasons I resigned as
Team leader.
In fact, the whole project turned out to be political and funded by the Deputy Priminister
who disagreed with the language policy of his own Ministry of Education!
The Lecturers also soon realised that we, the Training
Fellows, had not been consulted or informed about the purpose of the project
either.
Much to their credit and that of the HOD in my opinion, and in the characteristically polite and diplomatic way of Malaysians not
wanting to offend, they ‘decided’ that
the best solution was for us to stay–but on the condition that we do absolutely
nothing at all which interfered with their work! This was a complex and contradictory
issue because it eventually emerged that
the aim of the project was to ‘update
and modernise’ the methodological and pedagogical skills of the Lecturers themselves.! This fact
only became clear to the lecturers a few
months after the project had started.
You can imagine what the Lecturers thought of that!
Again, nothing wrong with that objective, to upgrade
pedagogy-except that many of the Malaysian Lecturers were more experienced than
the Training Fellows themselves!
There had been absolutely no preparation or training for any
of the stakeholders in this project by either the Ministry of Education or the
company!
Who was to blame ultimately is another matter, and this Is probably not
the place to go into it . Suffice it to
say that the highly politicised nature of language instruction in Malaysia and
the lethargic pace of operation of the Ministry of Education had a lot to do
with it.
A complete waste of Taxpayers money? Yes, of course..but what
I want to focus on is the completely unethical and unacceptable behavior of the
British Company
All of the Training Fellows were put in an absolutely
intolerable situation where our professionalism
was completely compromised. We were being paid and obliged to do nothing!
It was like one of those experiments where humans were paid to inflict pain on
victims
I had resigned as leader after 3 months inventing a bogus
health complaint. But I desperately wanted the project to recover and continue
for the simple reason that I needed the money. However, after twelve months I too
had had enough of doing nothing and I was the eighth of the fifteen Training
Fellows to resign and return to Australia.
During my fifteen months in Malaysia I listened to many an
exhortation from colleagues to sit and do nothing and take the money. But
In the end I could not sustain it.
No comments:
Post a Comment