Outsider


I grew up in Northern Ireland and have been a teacher and lived in England, Ghana, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Malawi, Mexico, Colombia, The United Arab Emirates, Australia, Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia.

These are my memoirs which are arranged chronologically by year. Much is social commentary.

Aside from narrative recount, the style is often anecdotal, aphoristic and ironical. I try to soften the heavy social commentary with humour. Some friends have said I tend to 'rant' at times. I don't deny it! Perhaps it is the Irish in me. I apologise in advance then, if that is your impression too.

I do not intend to stereotype various nationalities but inevitably I will generalise for dramatic effect.

In a globalised multicultural world there is an urgent need to identify and face up to our national idiosyncracies and shortcomings. Nationalism has always seemed to me to be a bogus substitute for a genuine sense of connectedness and community. It is a highly dangerous concept when manipulated by politicians to get citizens to do things that are unpalatable to them-like going to war for instance.

If we don't begin to see ourselves as others perceive us - and not as we would like to see ourselves, then catastrophe looms.

I contend we can be comfortable with our heritage and still be able to criticize and even laugh at ourselves at the same time.


The two are not mutually exclusive.

Outsiders are in a unique position to show us our shortcomings because we simply cannot see them ourselves.

I believe that no culture has found the ideal 'solutions' to the challenges of life. Every culture I have lived in has both positive and disturbing characteristics.

In which cultures do people appear happiest? (notwithstanding natural and man-made disasters such as war and famine)

What question can be more profound than that?

The results may be surprising. In my experience, the happiest cultures were Ghana, Malawi, Mexico and Colombia. At the bottom of the list would be England, Ireland and Australia.

I think we need to learn from each other-not try to 'teach' each other...there is a big difference.

Please send me an E-mail if you would like to comment on anything.


Outsider


Outsider1952@gmail.com









Search This Blog

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu

Retirement, Kota Kinabalu
This is where I would like to be after I have robbed the bank

Winners and Losers

Winners and Losers
Debate 2008 Winners and Losers Editor at left.

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

2015 Close-up photography in movies:when is pimply photography going to end?

I have been threatening to post about this for a long time

Please..Please...Please...

When are we going to see the end of 'Pimply Photography'??!!

I mean close-ups of people's faces in movies and TV shows?

For God's sake I don't want to see the pimples of Brad Pitt or Angelina?

Why do we have to see the faces of  Actors and Actress so up close and personal?

Do we need their 'meaningful looks' as the camera lingers for far too long after they have said something profound and deeply meaningful...(and often clichéd)


Actually, these were rhetorical questions

Because I know the answers...



Pimply photography is rampant because the close-up view of the face replaces  dialogue and plot.

Many dialogues and plots of ratings-driven dramas  are so weak they have to replace them  with pimply photography. People like looking at faces and pimples.

No!!!!!

Don't replace dialogue and plot with pimples and 'meaningful, lingering looks!

Write a dialogue and plot.

Get on with it!




Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)